Individual Report (demo)

Pastor David Reyes

Executive Pastor
Working Genius
Geniuses: Galvanizing, Tenacity
Competencies: Wonder, Discernment, Enablement
Frustrations: Invention
DiSC (Wiley Everything DiSC)
C / D
D:70 · i:45 · S:50 · C:85
Capacity
79.6High
Vision 72 · Strategy 84 · Execution 90 · People 72 · Spiritual 80
TCA (Team Competency Assessment)
40 scores across self and 360° evaluators. Self-awareness is derived from the self/external gap.

CliftonStrengths

Talent domains

Top 5: Achiever · Discipline · Responsibility · Analytical · Focus

EQ-i 2.0

Emotional intelligence composites

108Total EQ
Standard scores (M=100, SD=15).

Judgment Index

Work Side vs Self Side

Work Side
8.0
People (Intrinsic)6.5 · balanced
Task (Extrinsic)8.6 · balanced
System (Systemic)8.9 · over
Self Side
7.8
Self-Worth7.2 · balanced
Role8.4 · balanced
Self-Direction7.8 · balanced
Consistency: 8.67 · Scores are Hartman axiology dimensions (0–10), not percentiles.

MBTI

Cognitive preferences

ESTJBest-fit type
ExtraversionVery Clear · 28Introversion
SensingClear · 18Intuition
ThinkingClear · 20Feeling
JudgingClear · 17Perceiving
MBTI describes cognitive preferences, not competence. Never used for hiring or selection.

Domain insights

Identity IntelligenceWho am I?
Precision and Command Profile
Pastor David’s profile is characterized by high precision and a preference for structured environments. DiSC data identifies a primary 'C' style (85) with a 'CD' pattern, suggesting a focus on accuracy, objectivity, and results. This aligns with his MBTI Step I 'ESTJ' (Verified Best Fit) report, indicating a natural preference for using Sensing and Thinking to provide order and logical structure to his external world. His DiSC secondary 'D' style (70) and MBTI 'EJ' preferences suggest he is comfortable taking charge and making quick, firm decisions based on facts. In a leadership context, he likely provides a high degree of stability and clear expectations, though his 'very clear' preference for Extraversion suggests he derives energy from external engagement despite his high Conscientiousness (C) orientation.
Contribution IntelligenceHow do I naturally contribute?
Tenacious Execution and Galvanization
In the contribution domain, David demonstrates high natural energy for the final stages of the workflow. Working Genius identifies 'Tenacity' and 'Galvanizing' as his geniuses, meaning he excels at pushing projects to completion and rallying people to move toward a goal. Conversely, 'Invention' is noted as a frustration, suggesting he prefers refined processes over creating new concepts from scratch. His CliftonStrengths (Top 5: Achiever, Discipline, Responsibility, Analytical, Focus) reinforce this 'Tenacity' genius. With four themes in the Executing domain, he likely possesses an immense internal drive for task completion and organizational consistency. The 'Analytical' theme further supports his DiSC 'C' style, emphasizing a talent for deep-diving into data to find the root of an issue before taking responsibility for its resolution.
Leadership IntelligenceHow effectively do I lead?
High Operational Effectiveness and Strategy
The Team Capacity Snapshot indicates an 'overall high' capacity, with notable strength in 'Execution' (90) and 'Strategy' (84). This reflects a leader who is not only capable of doing the work but also understands how the pieces of the organizational puzzle fit together. His lowest score in this snapshot is 'Vision' (72), which aligns with his 'Invention' frustration in Working Genius. Competency data from the Team Capacity Assessment (TCA) shows very strong external perceptions in 'Mission Alignment' (4.23) and 'Team Development & Empowerment' (4.1). This suggests that while David is highly task-oriented, he is successfully translating his high expectations into team growth. His 'Relationship Building' score (4.0) shows no gap between self and external perception, highlighting a stable and reliable relational presence.
Decision IntelligenceHow do I make decisions?
Systemic Valuation and Tactical Judgment
According to the Judgment Index, David currently exhibits a 'balanced' valuation pattern across both Self and Work sides, with a specific emphasis on the 'System' dimension on the Work side (8.9). This 'over' weighting on systems suggests he places high value on organizational structures, policies, and overarching frameworks when making decisions. This systemic focus, paired with his 'Task' score (8.6), indicates he views situations through the lens of how they affect the broader organization's efficiency and order. His 'People' score (6.5) is his lowest on the Work side, suggesting that while his judgments are balanced, he may naturally prioritize systemic integrity and task completion over individual nuances when these values come into conflict.
Cross-domain
Communication Clarity Gap
A comparison between David’s self-assessment and external feedback on the TCA reveals a significant gap in 'Clear Communication & Listening' (gap of 0.33, with David rating himself 4.2 and external observers at 3.86). While both scores are still positive, this represents his largest perceptual gap. Given his high 'C' and 'D' DiSC scores and his ESTJ preference, David may believe he is being clear because he is being concise and logical; however, external team members may find his communication style either too brief, lacking in context, or missing a listening component. His high EQ-i Interpersonal Relationships score (118) suggests he has the capability for deep connection, but the TCA data implies a need to more intentionally apply this to his daily operational communication.
The Finisher's Challenge with Innovation
A consistent pattern emerges across David's profile regarding the 'Creation' versus 'Completion' spectrum. Working Genius lists 'Invention' as a frustration, CliftonStrengths shows zero themes in the 'Influencing' domain top 5, and the Capacity Snapshot shows 'Vision' (72) as a relative low point. This indicates that while David is an exceptional steward of established systems and an elite executor (CliftonStrengths Achiever/Discipline), he may find the 'blank page' phase of church growth or visionary shifts to be highly draining. His Leadership Insight score on the EQ-i (100) is typical, but his 'Coaching' (115) and 'Interpersonal' (118) strengths suggest he is better at developing people within a system than ideating new systems from scratch.

Recommendations

highcommunication
Implement 'Active Listening' check-ins during strategic execution meetings to close the communication gap.
The TCA shows a 0.33 gap in communication clarity/listening. By slowing down to verify that his concise execution-style (CD DiSC) has been understood and by seeking feedback, David can bridge the gap between his high self-rating and the team's perception.
mediumstrategic leadership
Partner with a 'Visionary/Inventor' personality for the 'Blank Page' phases of organizational strategy.
David's WG frustration in Invention and his lower TCA Vision score suggest he is more effective at refining and executing than creating. Partnering allows him to apply his high 'System' judgment and 'Tenacity' genius to a raw idea he didn't have to generate himself.
mediumemotional intelligence
Leverage exceptionally high Interpersonal Relationship EQ to soften the precision-driven 'C' behavioral style.
His EQ-i score for relationships is very high (118), yet his DiSC 'C' and JI 'System' focus can appear rigid. Intentionally using his relational intelligence to explain the 'why' behind systemic changes will increase buy-in from those who score lower on 'System' valuation.