Pastor David Reyes
CliftonStrengths
Talent domains
EQ-i 2.0
Emotional intelligence composites
Judgment Index
Work Side vs Self Side
MBTI
Cognitive preferences
Domain insights
Decision Intelligence
How do I make decisions?
Systemic Valuation and Tactical Judgment
According to the Judgment Index, David currently exhibits a 'balanced' valuation pattern across both Self and Work sides, with a specific emphasis on the 'System' dimension on the Work side (8.9). This 'over' weighting on systems suggests he places high value on organizational structures, policies, and overarching frameworks when making decisions. This systemic focus, paired with his 'Task' score (8.6), indicates he views situations through the lens of how they affect the broader organization's efficiency and order. His 'People' score (6.5) is his lowest on the Work side, suggesting that while his judgments are balanced, he may naturally prioritize systemic integrity and task completion over individual nuances when these values come into conflict.
Leadership Intelligence
How effectively do I lead?
High Operational Effectiveness and Strategy
The Team Capacity Snapshot indicates an 'overall high' capacity, with notable strength in 'Execution' (90) and 'Strategy' (84). This reflects a leader who is not only capable of doing the work but also understands how the pieces of the organizational puzzle fit together. His lowest score in this snapshot is 'Vision' (72), which aligns with his 'Invention' frustration in Working Genius. Competency data from the Team Capacity Assessment (TCA) shows very strong external perceptions in 'Mission Alignment' (4.23) and 'Team Development & Empowerment' (4.1). This suggests that while David is highly task-oriented, he is successfully translating his high expectations into team growth. His 'Relationship Building' score (4.0) shows no gap between self and external perception, highlighting a stable and reliable relational presence.
Identity Intelligence
Who am I?
Precision and Command Profile
Pastor David’s profile is characterized by high precision and a preference for structured environments. DiSC data identifies a primary 'C' style (85) with a 'CD' pattern, suggesting a focus on accuracy, objectivity, and results. This aligns with his MBTI Step I 'ESTJ' (Verified Best Fit) report, indicating a natural preference for using Sensing and Thinking to provide order and logical structure to his external world. His DiSC secondary 'D' style (70) and MBTI 'EJ' preferences suggest he is comfortable taking charge and making quick, firm decisions based on facts. In a leadership context, he likely provides a high degree of stability and clear expectations, though his 'very clear' preference for Extraversion suggests he derives energy from external engagement despite his high Conscientiousness (C) orientation.
Contribution Intelligence
How do I naturally contribute?
Tenacious Execution and Galvanization
In the contribution domain, David demonstrates high natural energy for the final stages of the workflow. Working Genius identifies 'Tenacity' and 'Galvanizing' as his geniuses, meaning he excels at pushing projects to completion and rallying people to move toward a goal. Conversely, 'Invention' is noted as a frustration, suggesting he prefers refined processes over creating new concepts from scratch. His CliftonStrengths (Top 5: Achiever, Discipline, Responsibility, Analytical, Focus) reinforce this 'Tenacity' genius. With four themes in the Executing domain, he likely possesses an immense internal drive for task completion and organizational consistency. The 'Analytical' theme further supports his DiSC 'C' style, emphasizing a talent for deep-diving into data to find the root of an issue before taking responsibility for its resolution.
Cross-domain
Communication Clarity Gap
A comparison between David’s self-assessment and external feedback on the TCA reveals a significant gap in 'Clear Communication & Listening' (gap of 0.33, with David rating himself 4.2 and external observers at 3.86). While both scores are still positive, this represents his largest perceptual gap. Given his high 'C' and 'D' DiSC scores and his ESTJ preference, David may believe he is being clear because he is being concise and logical; however, external team members may find his communication style either too brief, lacking in context, or missing a listening component. His high EQ-i Interpersonal Relationships score (118) suggests he has the capability for deep connection, but the TCA data implies a need to more intentionally apply this to his daily operational communication.
The Finisher's Challenge with Innovation
A consistent pattern emerges across David's profile regarding the 'Creation' versus 'Completion' spectrum. Working Genius lists 'Invention' as a frustration, CliftonStrengths shows zero themes in the 'Influencing' domain top 5, and the Capacity Snapshot shows 'Vision' (72) as a relative low point. This indicates that while David is an exceptional steward of established systems and an elite executor (CliftonStrengths Achiever/Discipline), he may find the 'blank page' phase of church growth or visionary shifts to be highly draining. His Leadership Insight score on the EQ-i (100) is typical, but his 'Coaching' (115) and 'Interpersonal' (118) strengths suggest he is better at developing people within a system than ideating new systems from scratch.